What was the dissenting opinion in Regents vs Bakke?
What was the dissenting opinion in Regents vs Bakke?
Tobriner dissented, stating that Mosk’s suggestion that the state open more medical schools to accommodate both white and minority was unrealistic due to cost: “It is a cruel hoax to deny minorities participation in the medical profession on the basis of such fanciful speculation.” The court barred the university from …
Was there a dissenting opinion in Regents of the University of California?
No and yes. There was no single majority opinion. Four of the justices contended that any racial quota system supported by government violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
What was the issue in Bakke v UC regents?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.
Why was the Bakke case such an important civil rights case?
Race, Education, and Affirmative Action Bakke claimed that he was a victim of reverse discrimination, and his case has been considered by many as the most important civil rights decision since the end of segregation—and also one of the most difficult ever heard by the Supreme Court.
What did the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke involve quizlet?
In Regents of University of California v. Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances.
How did the Regents of the University of California v. Bakke Supreme Court decision affect affirmative action programs in the United States?
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
How did the Regents of the University of California versus Bakke Supreme Court decision affect affirmative action programs in the United States?
What is the Bakke decision?
Why is Justice Powell’s concurring opinion in Board of Regents v. Bakke considered so important and influential?
Powell’s opinion would buoy the case for affirmative action in college admissions, but some legal scholars argue that it also transformed the conversation about race and equality in America by altering the meaning of one of the Civil War amendments to the Constitution aimed at ensuring equality for recently freed …
What was the outcome of the Bakke case?
Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.